Striking a balance between rules and principles-based approaches for effective governance: A risks-based approach [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 68 (1):53 - 82 (2006)
Several recent studies and initiatives have emphasized the importance of a strong ethical organizational DNA (ODNA) to create and promote an effective corporate governance culture of trust, integrity and intellectual honesty. This paper highlights the drawbacks of an excessively heavy reliance on rules-based approaches that increase the cost of doing business, overshadow essential elements of good corporate governance, create a culture of dependency, and can result in legal absolutism. The paper makes the case that the way forward for effective corporate governance is to strike an optimal balance between rules-based and principles-based approaches. The recent corporate scandals have demonstrated that the ethical ODNA is critical to the driving force and basis of legal and regulatory requirements. Effective governance means adhering to ethical principles, not merely complying with rules, and is a crucial guardian of a firm’s reputation and integrity. It is through an effective corporate governance program (that is, one that optimally captures and integrates the appropriate aspects of rules-based and principles-based approaches, and identifies and assesses the related risks) that an organization can reconfigure its ODNA for improved performance. Focusing on the ethical ODNA as the basis of new governance measures provides an opportunity to develop a competitive advantage as it represents a potential source of differentiation, strengthens the relationship with all stakeholders of the organization by building a culture of trust and integrity, and re-instills investor confidence. This paper employs dialectical reasoning that links the ODNA through principles-driven rules in developing a risks-based approach. A comparison from a risk assessment perspective between rules-based and principles-based approaches is presented. Although there have been few applications employing dialectical reasoning in business research, this methodology can be extremely useful in isolating ethical issues and integrating them into the business process. The risks-based approach captures the benefits of both rules-based and principles-based approaches, and incorporates trust-based principles such␣as solidarity, subsidiarity and covenantal relationships.
|Keywords||effective corporate governance organizational DNA ethics rules-based principles-based risks-based trust-based solidarity subsidiarity dialectical reasoning compliance|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Emanuele Bajo, Marco Bigelli, David Hillier & Barbara Petracci (2009). The Determinants of Regulatory Compliance: An Analysis of Insider Trading Disclosures in Italy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):331 - 343.
Elizabeth Dreike Almer, Audrey A. Gramling & Steven E. Kaplan (2008). Impact of Post-Restatement Actions Taken by a Firm on Non-Professional Investors' Credibility Perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (1):61 - 76.
Liviu Florea, Yu Ha Cheung & Neil C. Herndon (2013). For All Good Reasons: Role of Values in Organizational Sustainability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):393-408.
Similar books and articles
Elias Bengtsson (2007). Organisational Approaches to Corporate Governance: An Empirical Study on Shareholder Activism. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):238-249.
Silvia Ayuso & Antonio Argandoña, Responsible Corporate Governance: Towards a Stakeholder Board of Directors?
Waymond Rodgers (2010). Three Primary Trust Pathways Underlying Ethical Considerations. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):83 - 93.
Jaap Hage (1996). A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):199-273.
Albert D. Spalding & Alfonso Oddo (2011). It's Time for Principles-Based Accounting Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (S1):49-59.
Silke Machold, Pervaiz K. Ahmed & Stuart S. Farquhar (2008). Corporate Governance and Ethics: A Feminist Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):665 - 678.
Cam Caldwell & Ranjan Karri (2005). Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems: A Covenantal Approach to Building Trust. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):249 - 259.
Samuel Mansell (2008). Proximity and Rationalisation: The Limits of a Levinasian Ethics in the Context of Corporate Governance and Regulation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):565 - 577.
Terri L. Herron & David L. Gilbertson (2004). Ethical Principles Vs. Ethical Rules. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):499-523.
Linda M. Sama & Victoria Shoaf (2005). Reconciling Rules and Principles: An Ethics-Based Approach to Corporate Governance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):177 - 185.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #59,222 of 1,102,748 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,987 of 1,102,748 )
How can I increase my downloads?