Consistent inconsistency theories

Inquiry 50 (6):639 – 654 (2007)
Abstract
In this paper I critically evaluate a number of current "consistent inconsistency theories" and then briefly motivate a rival position. The rival position challenges a consistent inconsistency theory, by sharing many of its basic commitments without suffering the problems that such a theory appears to face
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740701698647
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 19,646
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Matti Eklund (2002). Inconsistent Languages. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):251-275.
Matti Eklund (2002). Inconsistent Languages. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):251-75.
Matti Eklund (2002). Deep Inconsistency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):321 – 331.
Douglas Patterson (2006). Theories of Meaning and Semantic Paradox. In Marta Bílková & Ondřej Tomala (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2005. Filosofia 139--148.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

23 ( #157,399 of 1,789,930 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #423,018 of 1,789,930 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.