Consistent inconsistency theories

Inquiry 50 (6):639 – 654 (2007)
In this paper I critically evaluate a number of current "consistent inconsistency theories" and then briefly motivate a rival position. The rival position challenges a consistent inconsistency theory, by sharing many of its basic commitments without suffering the problems that such a theory appears to face
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740701698647
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,305
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Eklund Matti (2002). Inconsistent Languages. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):251-75.
Matti Eklund (2002). Deep Inconsistency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):321 – 331.
Douglas Patterson (2006). Theories of Meaning and Semantic Paradox. In Marta Bílková & Ondřej Tomala (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2005. Filosofia 139--148.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

28 ( #170,231 of 1,932,544 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #197,566 of 1,932,544 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.