In defence of the cognitivist theory of perception
Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):19-26 (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Cognitivism Epistemology Perception Berkeley Foster, J | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Foster (1970). In S Elf - Defence. In Graham Macdonald (ed.), Perception and Identity. Macmillan.
Howard M. Robinson (1994). Perception. New York: Routledge.
Georges Dicker (2006). Berkeley on Immediate Perception: Once More Unto the Breach. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):517–535.
Kenneth L. Pearce (2008). The Semantics of Sense Perception in Berkeley. Religious Studies 44 (3):249-268.
Nick Zangwill (2009). Non-Cognitivism and Motivation. In Constantine Sandis (ed.), New Essays on the Explanation of Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jody Graham (1997). Common Sense and Berkeley's Perception by Suggestion. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (3):397 – 423.
John A. Foster (2000). The Nature of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brice N. Fleming (1962). The Nature of Perception. Review of Metaphysics 16 (December):259-295.
David M. Armstrong (1961). Perception And The Physical World. Humanities Press.
John A. Foster (2004). Reply to Armstrong. Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):27-28.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 550,917 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,807 of 550,917 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
