Laws of nature as relations between universals and as universals
Philosophical Topics 13 (1):7-24 (1982)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLarry Lee Blackman (1983). Russell on the Relations of Universals and Particulars. Philosophy Research Archives 9:265-278.
Kadri Vihvelin (1990). Freedom, Necessity, and Laws of Nature as Relations Between Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy (December) 371 (December):371-381.
David M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals Vol. Ii. Cambridge University Press.
Paweł Rojek (2008). Three Trope Theories. Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
Joan Pagès (2002). Structural Universals and Formal Relations. Synthese 131 (2):215 - 221.
Michael J. Loux (ed.) (1970/1976). Universals and Particulars: Readings in Ontology. University of Notre Dame Press.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
D. M. Armstrong (1983). What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press.
John Bolender (2006). Nomic Universals and Particular Causal Relations: Which Are Basic and Which Are Derived? Philosophia 34 (4):405-410.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads12 ( #94,544 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
