A response to Martel's 'Amo: Volu ut sis: Love, willing, and Arendt's reluctant embrace of sovereignty'
Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (6):609-617 (2012)
|Abstract||In this article I respond to James Martel’s essay ‘ Amo: Volu ut sis : Love, willing, and Arendt’s reluctant embrace of sovereignty’. Martel offers us a provocative account of how Arendt might have attenuated her most severe rejections of the concept of sovereignty in light of the necessity of some version of sovereignty in modern times. However, I argue that Martel misreads Arendt, drawing inferences from Arendt’s inner/outer distinction that do not follow from Arendt’s own logic. Instead of this distinction, I claim that Arendt’s rejection of sovereignty must be understood in the context of her affirmation of natality, and that a consistent reading of Arendt reveals an unstinting rejection of sovereignty, for both good and ill|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Martel (2008). Amo: Volo Ut Sis: Love, Willing and Arendt's Reluctant Embrace of Sovereignty. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (3):287-313.
Seyla Benhabib (ed.) (2010). Politics in Dark Times: Encounters with Hannah Arendt. Cambridge University Press.
James R. Martel (2012). Divine Violence: Walter Benjamin and the Eschatology of Sovereignty. Routledge.
Charles Barbour & George Pavlich (eds.) (2010). After Sovereignty: On the Question of Political Beginnings. Routledge.
Dana R. Villa (1998). Seyla Benhabib, The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt:The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Ethics 108 (4):817-820.
A. D. Barder & F. Debrix (2011). Agonal Sovereignty: Rethinking War and Politics with Schmitt, Arendt and Foucault. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (7):775-793.
Annabel Herzog (2004). Political Itineraries and Anarchic Cosmopolitanism in the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Inquiry 47 (1):20 – 41.
Peg Birmingham (2003). Holes of Oblivion: The Banality of Radical Evil. Hypatia 18 (1):80-103.
Michael Halberstam (2001). Aestheticism, or Aesthetic Approach, in Arendt and Heidegger on Politics. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:219-232.
P. Birmingham (2003). The Pleasure of Your Company: Arendt, Kristeva, and an Ethics of Public Happiness. Research in Phenomenology 33 (1):53-74.
Roger Berkowitz (ed.) (2010). Thinking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics. Fordham University Press.
Andrew Arato & Jean Cohen (2009). Banishing the Sovereign? Internal and External Sovereignty in Arendt. Constellations 16 (2):307-330.
Lauren Swayne Barthold (2000). Towards an Ethics of Love: Arendt on the Will and St Augustine. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (6):1-20.
Simon Swift (2009). Hannah Arendt. Routledge.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-07-25
Total downloads1 ( #291,948 of 729,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 729,711 )
How can I increase my downloads?