Are There Really Instantaneous Velocities?
The Monist 83 (2):187-208 (2000)
| Abstract | Zeno argued that since at any instant an arrow does not change its location, the arrow does not move at any time, and hence motion is impossible. I discuss the following three views that one could take in view of Zeno's argument:(i) the "at-at" theory, according to which there is no such thing as instantaneous velocity, while motion in the sense of the occupation of different locations at different times is possible,(ii) the "impetus" theory, according to which instantaneous velocities do exist but these are only contingently and causally related to the temporal developments of positions,(iii) the "no instants" theory, according to which instants in time do not exist, and hence instantaneous velocities do not exist, while motion, in the sense of different areas occupied during different time intervals, is possible.I argue that, despite the fact that there have been interesting and relevant developments in mathematics and physics since the time of Zeno, each of these views still has serious drawbacks | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesR. S. (2003). Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?: An Argument for the Affirmative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):261-280.
Sheldon R. Smith (2003). Are Instantaneous Velocities Real and Really Instantaneous?: An Argument for the Affirmative. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):261-280.
F. Arntzenius (2003). An Arbitrarily Short Reply to Sheldon Smith on Instantaneous Velocities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (2):281-282.
John W. Carroll (2002). Instantaneous Motion. Philosophical Studies 110 (1):49 - 67.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2008). Can I Be an Instantaneous Stage and yet Persist Through Time? Metaphysica 9 (2):235-239.
Ulrich Meyer (2003). The Metaphysics of Velocity. Philosophical Studies 112 (1):93 - 102.
William I. McLaughlin & Sylvia L. Miller (1992). An Epistemological Use of Nonstandard Analysis to Answer Zeno's Objections Against Motion. Synthese 92 (3):371 - 384.
Susan Brower-Toland (2002). Instantaneous Change and the Physics of Sanctification: "Quasi-Aristotelianism" in Henry of Ghent's Quodlibet XV Q. 13. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1):19-46.
Joseph S. Alper & Mark Bridger (1997). Mathematics, Models and Zeno's Paradoxes. Synthese 110 (1):143-166.
Joseph S. Alper & Mark Bridger (1997). Mathematics, Models and Zeno's Paradoxes. Synthese 110 (1):143-166.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-03-18Total downloads11 ( #99,611 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,303 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
