Listed below are some examples that Mil introduces to help interpret his liberty principle and to illustrate its application
| Abstract | Mill holds that in some of these cases the restriction of liberty that is proposed is permissible according to the liberty principle. In other cases, the proposed restriction violates the liberty principle as Mill understands it. (Mill first formulates the "liberty principle" on p. 9.). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesY. N. Chopra (1994). Mill′s Principle of Liberty. Philosophy 69 (270):417-.
H. J. McCloskey (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I). Inquiry 13 (1-4):219 – 237.
Preston King (2000). Liberty: All Coherence Gone? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):25-48.
John Kilcullen (1981). Mill on Duty and Liberty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):290 – 300.
Jonathan Riley (2005). J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression. Utilitas 17 (2):147-179.
Jonathan Wolff (1998). Mill, Indecency and the Liberty Principle. Utilitas 10 (01):1-.
Sanford S. Levy (1985). Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278.
Mulnix (2009). Harm, Rights, and Liberty: Towards a Non-Normative Reading of Mill's Liberty Principle. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):196-217.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,739 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
