Listed below are some examples that Mil introduces to help interpret his liberty principle and to illustrate its application
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mill holds that in some of these cases the restriction of liberty that is proposed is permissible according to the liberty principle. In other cases, the proposed restriction violates the liberty principle as Mill understands it. (Mill first formulates the "liberty principle" on p. 9.).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Y. N. Chopra (1994). Mill's Principle of Liberty. Philosophy 69 (270):417 - 441.
H. J. McCloskey (1970). Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I). Inquiry 13 (1-4):219 – 237.
Preston King (2000). Liberty: All Coherence Gone? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):25-48.
John Kilcullen (1981). Mill on Duty and Liberty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):290 – 300.
Jonathan Riley (2005). J. S. Mill's Doctrine of Freedom of Expression. Utilitas 17 (2):147-179.
Jonathan Wolff (1998). Mill, Indecency and the Liberty Principle. Utilitas 10 (1):1-16.
Sanford S. Levy (1985). Richard McCormick and Proportionate Reason. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):258 - 278.
Mulnix (2009). Harm, Rights, and Liberty: Towards a Non-Normative Reading of Mill's Liberty Principle. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):196-217.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #91,473 of 1,696,465 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #183,308 of 1,696,465 )
How can I increase my downloads?