Letters pro and con
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19 (3):347-348 (1961)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrederick R. Love (1965). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 24 (1):121.
George P. Landow (1968). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (1):99-101.
Hilaire Hiler (1954). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (1):109-110.
Amy Goldin (1968). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27 (2):227-229.
Gillo Dorfles (1956). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 14 (3):387-388.
George Boas (1957). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (3):355.
John H. Baron (1971). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29 (3):399-401.
R. A. Wajid (1968). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (3):389-390.
G. B. Mohan (1964). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 22 (3):337.
Rudolf Arnheim (1971). Letters Pro and Con. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 30 (2):255-256.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
