Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):155-173 (2003)
|Abstract||Libertarian theories of the normative core of the corporation hold in common the view that is the responsibility of publicity held corporations to return profits to shareholders within the bounds of certain moral side-constraints. Side-constraints may be either weak (grounded in the rules of the game) or strong (grounded in rights). This essay considers libertarian arguments regarding the normative core of the corporation in the context of global capitalism and in the light of actual corporate behavior. First, it is argued the weak side-constraints view is conceptually incoherent when applied in a global context. Second, it is argued that proponents of the libertarian strong side-constraints view lack an adequate theory of rights. Third, both the weak side-constraints view and the strong side-constraints view are shown to be unsatisfactory insofar as they fail to adequately address the coercive power of corporations. The main conclusion of this essay is that a viable libertarian theory of the corporation has yet to be articulated|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Xiaoping Chen (2011). Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations: A Comment on Kim's Theory of Supervenience. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):316-333.
Donna J. Wood (2002). Business Citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):155-187.
Mark T. Nelson (2009). A Problem for Conservatism. Analysis 69 (4):620-630.
Jeanne M. Logsdon & Donna J. Wood (2002). Business Citizenship: From Domestic to Global Level of Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):155-188.
Mark Moyer (2008). Weak and Global Supervenience Are Strong. Philosophical Studies 138 (1):125 - 150.
Cynthia Stohl, Michael Stohl & Lucy Popova (2009). A New Generation of Corporate Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):607 - 622.
Ervin Laszlo (2007). Evolution of the Global Corporation: A Systemic Perspective. World Futures 63 (8):563 – 567.
Dwight R. Lee & Richard B. McKenzie (1994). Corporate Failure as a Means to Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):969 - 978.
R. Edward Freeman & Robert A. Phillips (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (3):331-350.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads34 ( #40,509 of 722,750 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,750 )
How can I increase my downloads?