David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (2):115-136 (2000)
Can economics, which is based on the notion of individual optimization, really model individuals who have a sense of exteriority? This question, derived both from Marcel Mauss's sociological analysis of the social norm of gift-giving and from Emmanuel Levinas's phenomenological analysis of the idea of 'otherness,' leads to the problem of whether it is possible to model altruism with the tool of optimization. By investigating the ways in which economic theory can address this challenge, and by introducing a postulate of methodological altruism following Levinas's theory of the constitution of subjectivity through otherness, this paper uncovers an alternative foundation for the very notion of optimizing calculation - no longer as a self-centered initiative, but rather as an other-centered response. This makes it possible to clarify the implicit content of usual economic individualism, and to see on the basis of which ethical arguments the economic method of optimization may be upheld. The paper studies the consequences of this renewed foundation of optimization for the organization of a fair and efficient interaction between altruists
|Keywords||altruism gift-giving Levinas Mauss methodological individualism philosophy of economics rational choice theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Guglielmo Faldetta (2011). The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (S1):67-77.
Alejo José G. Sison & Joana Fontrodona (2015). The Neglected Ethical and Spiritual Motivations in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 128 (4):803-816.
Similar books and articles
Juergen Lange-Von Kulessa (1997). Searching for a Methodological Synthesis -Hayek's Individualism in the Light of Recent Holistic Criticism. Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (2):267-287.
Thomas L. Clarke (2005). Sleep is Optimizing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):66-67.
Björn Hagströmer, Richard G. Anderson, Jane M. Binner, Thomas Elger & Birger Nilsson, Mean-Variance Vs. Full-Scale Optimization: Broad Evidence for the UK.
Sahotra Sarkar (2005). Maynard Smith, Optimization, and Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 20 (5):951-966.
Wolfram Latsch (2003). Androids and Agents: Do We Need a Non‐Computational Economics? Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):375-396.
Paul Weirich (2010). Optimization and Improvement. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 148 (3):467 - 475.
Daniel J. Gilman (1993). Optimization and Simplicity: Marr's Theory of Vision and Biological Explanation. Synthese 107 (3):293-323.
Daniel R. Fusfeld (1996). Rationality and Economic Behavior. Journal of Economic Methodology 3 (2):307-315.
Frédéric Laville (2000). Should We Abandon Optimization Theory? The Need for Bounded Rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (3):395-426.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #213,948 of 1,789,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,435 of 1,789,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?