No regrets, or: Edith piaf revamps decision theory [Book Review]

Erkenntnis 68 (2):277-297 (2008)
I argue that standard decision theories, namely causal decision theory and evidential decision theory, both are unsatisfactory. I devise a new decision theory, from which, under certain conditions, standard game theory can be derived
Keywords Decision theory  Game theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/40267481
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Arif Ahmed (2012). Push the Button. Philosophy of Science 79 (3):386-395.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
David Lewis (1981). Causal Decision Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1):5 – 30.
Reed Richter (1984). Rationality Revisited. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (4):392 – 403.
Ellery Eells (1984). Causal Decision Theory. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:177 - 200.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

253 ( #3,787 of 1,725,194 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

15 ( #48,689 of 1,725,194 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.