Graduate studies at Western
Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):353-377 (2009)
|Abstract||The Endangered Species Act (ESA) can impose significant limitations on what landowners may do with their property, especially as it pertains to development. These restrictions imposed by the ESA are part of a larger controversy about the reach of the of the Fifth Amendment, which says that private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. The question this paper addresses is whether these restrictions require compensation. The paper develops a position on the general question of compensation for regulatory takings and applies it to the ESA. The main argument concludes that compensation should be paid. It is based on the proposition that the goods provided by regulatory takings are typically public goods, and on a principle of fairness, which holds that compensation should be paid when those who benefit from a regulatory taking pay virtually nothing and those who pay receive hardly any benefit. It is argued that this principle is implicit in many of the Court's rulings on regulatory takings|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
B. G. Sundholm, Oordeel En Gevolgtrekking. Bedreigde Species?(Judgement and Inference: Endangered Species?).
Hal R. Varian (1993). Markets for Public Goods? Critical Review 7 (4):539-557.
Tyler Cowen & Gregory Kavka (2003). The Public Goods Rationale for Government and the Circularity Problem. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):265-277.
Harold Demsetz (1993). The Private Production of Public Goods, Once Again. Critical Review 7 (4):559-566.
Jonny Anomaly (2011). Public Health and Public Goods. Public Health Ethics 4 (3):251-259.
William Boardman, Some Themes in David Schmidtz, the Limits of Government: An Essay on the Public Goods Argument (Westview Press: 1991).
Lilly-Marlene Russow (1981). Why Do Species Matter? Environmental Ethics 3 (2):101-112.
David H. Bennett (1986). Triage as a Species Preservation Strategy. Environmental Ethics 8 (1):47-58.
Ian A. Smith (2010). The Role of Humility and Intrinsic Goods in Preserving Endangered Species. Environmental Ethics 32 (2):165-182.
Added to index2009-06-25
Total downloads27 ( #51,731 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?