Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):356-369 (2012)
|Abstract||Weber’s notion of ideal-types has most frequently been rejected as incoherent or overly abstract. This article maintains that it insightfully addresses explanatory issues in social science by encompassing the agents’ subjective understanding and the need for theorists to comprehend, explain, and evaluate it. As such, ideal-types are not versions of established models in natural science or economics. Further keys are seeing ideal-types as blending interpretive understanding and causal explanation but not thereby causal generalizations, and rational appraisals as consistent with value pluralism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn (1997). Webers Idealtypus AlS Methode Zur Bestimmung Des Begriffsinhaltes Theoretischer Begriffe in den Kulturwissenschaften. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28 (2):275 - 296.
Asaf Kedar (2007). Ideal Types as Hermeneutic Concepts. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (3):318-345.
Richard P. Nielsen (1984). Toward an Action Philosophy for Managers Based on Arendt and Tillich. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (2):153 - 161.
Jeffry L. Ramsey (1994). Ideal Reaction Types and the Reactions of Real Alloys. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:149 - 159.
Giovanni Camardi (2004). Ideal Types and Scientific Theories. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):273-285.
Rachel Torr (2008). Theoretical Perspectives as Ideal-Types: Typologies as Means Not Ends. Social Epistemology 22 (2):145 – 164.
Kurt H. Wolff (1980). Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation: History, Laws, and Ideal Types. Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1):103-106.
Rüdiger W. Waldkirch, Matthias Meyer & Karl Homann (2009). Accounting for the Benefits of Social Security and the Role of Business: Four Ideal Types and Their Different Heuristics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (3):247 - 267.
Erik Weber & Jeroen Van Bouwel (2009). Causation, Unification, and the Adequacy of Explanations of Facts. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 24 (3):301-320.
Ruth V. Aguilera & Abhijeet K. Vadera (2008). The Dark Side of Authority: Antecedents, Mechanisms, and Outcomes of Organizational Corruption. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 77 (4):431 - 449.
Stephen R. Munzer (2012). Innocence. Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):125-143.
John Drysdale (1996). How Are Social-Scientific Concepts Formed? A Reconstruction of Max Weber's Theory of Concept Formation. Sociological Theory 14 (1):71-88.
Frederic Vandenberghe (1999). Simmel and Weber as Ideal-Typical Founders of Sociology. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (4):57-80.
J. W. N. Watkins (1952). Ideal Types and Historical Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (9):22-43.
Added to index2011-05-28
Total downloads20 ( #68,391 of 740,551 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,455 of 740,551 )
How can I increase my downloads?