What Are Thoughts?

Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this dissertation, I investigate a conception of thoughts figuring in ordinary discourse, and argue that this conception is an improvement over a certain standard conception employed in current philosophical and linguistic endeavors. ;In Chapter 2, I discuss the leading principles of the standard conception, a conception according to which thoughts in general are to be identified with propositions. I also briefly preview some of the main features that distinguish the conception developed in the course of this study from the standard conception. ;Chapter 4 is the heart of the thesis. I isolate a reading of the verb 'think' that I contend is both familiar from and central to our ordinary discourse about thoughts and thinking--the "generic reading", I call it. An investigation of the relation expressed by the verb, 'think', on this generic reading, and of the correlative conception of thoughts, occupies the remainder of the study. ;If this ordinary conception of thoughts is to serve the principal functions to which thoughts have standardly been assigned, in philosophical and linguistic endeavors, then there should be a discernible sense in which it is correct to say that thoughts, so conceived, are things that sentences express. In Chapter 5, I discuss the relevant notion of sentential expression. Accounts of this notion have commonly faced a stumbling block in the case of non-declarative sentences. What sort of thoughts, for example, can imperatives or interrogatives be said to express? In Chapter 6, I explain how, on the present conception, there is a clear sense in which sentences of a variety of grammatical moods--imperatives and interrogatives as well as declaratives--may be said, with equal propriety, to express thoughts. ;In Chapter 7, I discuss a fundamental thesis of the standard conception, and argue, in Chapter 8, that any account of the nature of thoughts accommodating this thesis is incompatible with the conception of thoughts arrived at in Chapter 4. Then, in order to retain this familiar conception and its benefits, a new account of the nature of thoughts must be provided. Such an account is described in Chapter 9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Issues in Externalism.John Santercole Gibbons - 1993 - Dissertation, Brown University
Inexplicit Thoughts.Christopher Gauker - 2013 - In Laurence Goldstein (ed.), Brevity. Oxford University Press. pp. 74-90.
Can you think my 'I'-thoughts?Daniel Morgan - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):68-85.
Reid on fictional objects and the way of ideas.Ryan Nichols - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):582-601.
Frege on thoughts and their structure.José Luis Bermúdez - 2001 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 4:87-105.
You and me.Guy Longworth - 2014 - Philosophical Explorations 17 (3):289-303.
‘I’-Thoughts and Explanation: Reply to Garrett.JosÉ Luis BermÚdez - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):432-436.
Cartesian Consciousness Reconsidered.Alison Simmons - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
In defense of wordless thoughts about thoughts.Robert W. Lurz - 2007 - Mind and Language 22 (3):270–296.
Limited Accessibility of Indexical Thoughts.Peter Edward Pruim - 1989 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Reflective Reasoning in Groups.Christina Slade - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.
The thought: A logical inquiry.Gottlob Frege - 1956 - Mind 65 (259):289-311.
How to Russell a Frege-Church.David Kaplan - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):716-729.

View all 15 references / Add more references