Moral Worth

Journal of Philosophy 99 (5):223-245 (2002)
I argue that a right action has moral worth if and only if it is done for the right reasons - that is, for its right-making features. The reasons the agent acts on have to be identical to the reasons for which the action is right. I argue that Kantians are wrong in thinking that a right action has moral worth iff it is done because the agent thinks it is right, giving examples of morally worthy actions that are done by agents who think they are wrong (Huckleberry Finn) and right actions done "because they are right" that have no moral worth. I also discuss degrees of moral worth as well as blameworthiness.
Keywords Moral Worth  Reasons  Huckleberry Finn  Praiseworthiness  Blameworthiness  Motive of Duty  Right Reasons  Huck Finn  Moral Reasons  Inverse Akrasia
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI jphil200299528
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Brian Weatherson (2013). Running Risks Morally. Philosophical Studies 167 (1):1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

390 ( #1,854 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

54 ( #21,421 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.