Moral Worth

Journal of Philosophy 99 (5):223-245 (2002)
Abstract
I argue that a right action has moral worth if and only if it is done for the right reasons - that is, for its right-making features. The reasons the agent acts on have to be identical to the reasons for which the action is right. I argue that Kantians are wrong in thinking that a right action has moral worth iff it is done because the agent thinks it is right, giving examples of morally worthy actions that are done by agents who think they are wrong (Huckleberry Finn) and right actions done "because they are right" that have no moral worth. I also discuss degrees of moral worth as well as blameworthiness.
Keywords Moral Worth  Reasons  Huckleberry Finn  Praiseworthiness  Blameworthiness  Motive of Duty  Right Reasons  Huck Finn  Moral Reasons  Inverse Akrasia
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Brian Weatherson (2013). Running Risks Morally. Philosophical Studies 167 (1):1-23.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

263 ( #1,504 of 1,102,917 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

39 ( #2,217 of 1,102,917 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.