Praise, Blame and the Whole Self
Philosophical Studies 93 (2):161-188 (1999)
| Abstract | What is that makes an act subject to either praise or blame? The question has often been taken to depend entirely on the free will debate for an answer, since it is widely agreed that an agent’s act is subject to praise or blame only if it was freely willed, but moral theory, action theory, and moral psychology are at least equally relevant to it. In the last quarter-century, following the lead of Harry Frankfurt’s (1971) seminal article “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,” the interdisciplinary nature of the question has been emphasized by various authors. Going beyond the boundaries of the traditional free will debate, they have attempted to describe the requirements for agent accountability by appeal to theories of personality, rational agency, and ethical choice. The approach has been a breath of fresh air in the often-stagnant free will debate, bringing new considerations to bear and provoking new lines of argument, and it is an approach that we will adopt in this paper. In the following pages, we hope to show that an under-noticed phenomenon of moral psychology, inverse akrasia, exemplified by Huckleberry Finn, has something to contribute to the understanding of agency and accountability. After presenting the phenomenon in section I, we will move in section II to a quick survey of a family of Frankfurt-inspired views and a critique of them based on the phenomenon in sections III and IV. A new theory will be offered in section V, and potential objections addressed in the final section of the paper. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Huck Finn Huckleberry Finn Inverse Akrasia Frankfurt Blame Praise | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,882 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMichael McKenna & Aron Vadakin (2008). George Sher,In Praise of Blame:In Praise of Blame. Ethics 118 (4):751-756.
Robert Pippin (2007). Can There Be 'Unprincipled Virtue'? Comments on Nomy Arpaly. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3):291 – 301.
Frank Hindriks (2008). Intentional Action and the Praise-Blame Asymmetry. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):630-641.
Richard Double (1997). Misdirection on the Free Will Problem. American Philosophical Quarterly 34 (3):359-68.
J. J. C. Smart (1963). Free Will, Praise and Blame. Mind 70 (279):291-306.
Andrew Eshleman, Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Barbara Houston (1992). In Praise of Blame. Hypatia 7 (4):128 - 147.
Angela M. Smith (2008). Character, Blameworthiness, and Blame: Comments on George Sher's in Praise of Blame. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):31 - 39.
Garrath Williams, Praise and Blame. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads183 ( #1,676 of 556,909 )Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #6,190 of 556,909 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
