Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):200-223 (2012)
|Abstract||Many have argued against the claim that Plato posited the mathematical objects that are the subjects of Metaphysics M and N. This paper shifts the burden of proof onto these objectors to show that Plato did not posit these entities. It does so by making two claims: first, that Plato should posit the mathematical Intermediates because Forms and physical objects are ill suited in comparison to Intermediates to serve as the objects of mathematics; second, that their utility, combined with Aristotle’s commentary on Plato’s posit of Intermediates, provides good reason to conclude that Plato did posit them|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lee Franklin (2012). Inventing Intermediates: Mathematical Discourse and Its Objects in Republic VII. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (4):483-506.
Arthur Madigan (1986). Syrianus and Asclepius on Forms and Intermediates in Plato and Aristotle. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (2):149-171.
Clevis Headley (1997). Platonism and Metaphor in the Texts of Mathematics: GÃ¶Del and Frege on Mathematical Knowledge. [REVIEW] Man and World 30 (4):453-481.
J. M. Rist (1964). Equals and Intermediates in Plato. Phronesis 9 (1):27 - 37.
J. M. Rist (1964). Equals and Intermediates in Plato. Phronesis 9 (1):27-37.
John A. Brentlinger (1963). The Divided Line and Plato's 'Theory of Intermediates'. Phronesis 8 (2):146 - 166.
John A. Brentlinger (1963). The Divided Line and Plato's 'Theory, of Intermediates'. Phronesis 8 (1):146-166.
Davide Rizza (2011). Magicicada, Mathematical Explanation and Mathematical Realism. Erkenntnis 74 (1):101-114.
Jill North (2009). The “Structure” of Physics. Journal of Philosophy 106 (2):57-88.
Marc le Menestrel & Luk van Wassenhove (2001). The Domain and Interpretation of Utility Functions: An Exploration. Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):329-349.
Mary Leng (2010). Mathematics and Reality. OUP Oxford.
Jessica Carter (2004). Ontology and Mathematical Practice. Philosophia Mathematica 12 (3):244-267.
C. McLarty (2012). Introduction: Hypotheses and Progress. Philosophia Mathematica 20 (2):135-142.
Timothy John Nulty (2005). A Critique of Resnik's Mathematical Realism. Erkenntnis 62 (3):379 - 393.
Added to index2012-03-25
Total downloads16 ( #81,852 of 739,395 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,395 )
How can I increase my downloads?