David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Before establishing his mature interpretation of infinitesimals as fictions, Gottfried Leibniz had advocated their existence as actually existing entities in the continuum. In this paper I trace the development of these early attempts, distinguishing three distinct phases in his interpretation of infinitesimals prior to his adopting a fictionalist interpretation: (i) (1669) the continuum consists of assignable points separated by unassignable gaps; (ii) (1670-71) the continuum is composed of an infinity of indivisible points, or parts smaller than any assignable, with no gaps between them; (iii) (1672- 75) a continuous line is composed not of points but of infinitely many infinitesimal lines, each of which is divisible and proportional to a generating motion at an instant (conatus). In 1676, finally, Leibniz ceased to regard infinitesimals as actual, opting instead for an interpretation of them as fictitious entities which may be used as compendia loquendi to abbreviate mathematical reasonings.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Arthur, Leibniz's Syncategorematic Infinitesimals, Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis, and Newton's Proposition.
Richard Arthur (2004). The Enigma of Leibniz's Atomism. In Daniel Garber & Steven Nadler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume 1. OUP Oxford
Femando Joven (1997). Los Infinitesimales Como Ficciones Útiles Para Leibniz: La Polémica En la Academia de París (the Infinitesimals as Useful Fictions for Leibniz: The Controversy in the Paris Academy of Sciences). Theoria 12 (2):257-279.
Thomas Mormann & Mikhail G. Katz (2013). Infinitesimals as an Issue of Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
Manuel A. SeIlés (1999). Isaac Newton Y El Infinitesimal (Isaac Newton's Infinitesimals). Theoria 14 (3):431-460.
Hidé Ishiguro (1990). Leibniz's Philosophy of Logic and Language. Cambridge University Press.
Javier de Lorenzo (1985). Pascal Y Los Indivisibles. Theoria 1 (1):87-120.
Piotr Błaszczyk, Mikhail G. Katz & David Sherry (2013). Ten Misconceptions From the History of Analysis and Their Debunking. Foundations of Science 18 (1):43-74.
Jack D. Davidson (2003). Leibniz on the Labyrinth of Freedom. The Leibniz Review 13:19-43.
Timothy Crockett (2008). Space and Time in Leibniz's Early Metaphysics. The Leibniz Review 18:41-79.
Carl Hausman (1998). Infinitesimals as Origins of Evolution: Comments Prompted by Timothy Herron and Hilary Putnam on Peirce's Synechism and Infinitesimals. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 34 (3):627 - 640.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads47 ( #71,305 of 1,725,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #56,059 of 1,725,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?