Leibniz's Theory of Space
Foundations of Science (forthcoming)
| Abstract | In this paper I offer a fresh interpretation of Leibniz’s theory of space, in which I explain the connection of his relational theory to both his mathematical theory of analysis situs and his theory of substance. I argue that the elements of his mature theory are not bare bodies (as on a standard relationalist view) nor bare points (as on an absolutist view), but situations . Regarded as an accident of an individual body, a situation is the complex of its angles and distances to other co-existing bodies, founded in the representation or state of the substance or substances contained in the body. The complex of all such mutually compatible situations of co-existing bodies constitutes an order of situations , or instantaneous space. Because these relations of situation change from one instant to another, space is an accidental whole that is continuously changing and becoming something different, and therefore a phenomenon. As Leibniz explains to Clarke, it can be represented mathematically by supposing some set of existents hypothetically (and counterfactually) to remain in a fixed mutual relation of situation, and gauging all subsequent situations in terms of transformations with respect to this initial set. Space conceived in terms of such allowable transformations is the subject of Analysis Situs. Finally, insofar as space is conceived in abstraction from any bodies that might individuate the situations, it encompasses all possible relations of situation. This abstract space , the order of all possible situations , is an abstract entity, and therefore ideal | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTimothy Crockett (2008). Space and Time in Leibniz's Early Metaphysics. The Leibniz Review 18:41-79.
Alejandro Cassini (2005). Newton and Leibniz on Non-Substantival Space. Theoria 20 (1):25-43.
Alejandro Cassini (2005). Newton and Leibniz on Non-Substantival Space. Theoria 20 (1):25-43.
Richard Arthur (1994). Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
Vincenzo De Risi (2007). Geometry and Monadology: Leibniz's Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space. Birkhäuser.
Kenneth L. Manders (1982). On the Space-Time Ontology of Physical Theories. Philosophy of Science 49 (4):575-590.
John T. Roberts (2003). Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Brent Mundy (1983). Relational Theories of Euclidean Space and Minkowski Spacetime. Philosophy of Science 50 (2):205-226.
Ori Belkind (forthcoming). Leibniz and Newton on Space. Foundations of Science.
David F. Wolf Ii (1998). How Many Spaces Does It Take to Get to the Center of a Theory of Human Problem Solving? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (4):49-55.
Edward Slowik (2009). Newton's Metaphysics of Space: A “Tertium Quid” Betwixt Substantivalism and Relationism, or Merely a “God of the (Rational Mechanical) Gaps”? Perspectives on Science 17 (4):pp. 429-456.
Jerzy Gołosz (1999). On Field's Argument for Substantivalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):5 – 16.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-03-31Total downloads28 ( #44,065 of 549,060 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,060 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
