|Abstract||In this paper I try to sort out a tangle of issues regarding time, inertia, proper time and the so-called “clock hypothesis” raised by Harvey Brown's discussion of them in his recent book, Physical Relativity. I attempt to clarify the connection between time and inertia, as well as the deficiencies in Newton's “derivation” of Corollary 5, by giving a group theoretic treatment original with J.-P. Provost. This shows how both the Galilei and Lorentz transformations may be derived from the relativity principle on the basis of certain elementary assumptions regarding time. I then reflect on the implications of this derivation for understanding proper time and the clock hypothesis.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Roger Jones (1980). Is General Relativity Generally Relativistic? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 381.
Joel Hunter, Time Travel. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Daniel King (2004). Two-Dimensional Time: Macbeath's ``Time's Square'' and Special Relativity. Synthese 139 (3):421 - 428.
Max Born (1965). Einstein's Theory of Relativity. New York, Dover Publications.
Yuri Balashov & Michel Janssen (2003). Presentism and Relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):327-346.
Mario Bacelar Valente, Did the Concepts of Space and Time Change That Much with the 1905 Theory of Relativity?
A. D. Fokker (1965). Time and Space, Weight and Inertia. New York, Pergamon Press.
J. Earman & M. Friedman (1973). The Meaning and Status of Newton's Law of Inertia and the Nature of Gravitational Forces. Philosophy of Science 40 (3):329-359.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #45,806 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,205 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?