Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):183-184 (2002)
|Abstract||The “Perky effect” is the interference of visual imagery with vision. Studies of this effect show that visual imagery has more than symbolic properties, but these properties differ both spatially (including “pictorially”) and temporally from those of vision. We therefore reject both the literal picture-in-the-head view and the entirely symbolic view.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Antti Revonsuo (1998). Visual Perception and Subjective Visual Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):769-770.
Georg Goldenberg (2002). Loss of Visual Imagery: Neuropsychological Evidence in Search for a Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):191-191.
David Ingle (2002). Problems with a “Cortical Screen” for Visual Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):195-196.
Stephen Grossberg (2002). Neural Substrates of Visual Percepts, Imagery, and Hallucinations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):194-195.
Cameron Shelley (1996). Visual Abductive Reasoning in Archaeology. Philosophy of Science 63 (2):278-301.
Fred W. Mast (2005). Mental Images: Always Present, Never There. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):769-770.
Alumit Ishai & D. Sagi (1998). Visual Imagery and Visual Perception: The Role of Memory and Conscious Awareness. In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness II. MIT Press.
Dominic Gregory (2010). Visual Imagery: Visual Format or Visual Content? Mind and Language 25 (4):394-417.
Qasim Zaidi & A. Fuzz Griffiths (2002). Generic Assumptions Shared by Visual Perception and Imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):215-216.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads36 ( #38,024 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?