David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Semantics 6 (1):309-344 (1988)
We present a unified framework for the computational implementation of syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and even “stylistic” constraints on anaphora. We build on our BUILDERS implementation of Discourse Representation (DR) Theory and Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) discussed in Wada & Asher (1986). We develop and argue for a semantically based processing model for anaphora resolution that exploits a number of desirable features: (1) the partial semantics provided by the discourse representation structures (DRSs) of DR theory, (2) the use of syntactic and lexical features to filter out unacceptable potential anaphoric antecedents from the set of logically possible antecedents determined by the logical structure of the DRS, (3) the use of pragmatic or discourse constraints, noted by those working on focus, to impose a salience ordering on the set of grammatically acceptable potential antecedents. Only where there is a marked difference in the degree of salience among the possible antecedents does the salience ranking allow us to make predictions on preferred readings. In cases where the difference is extreme, we predict the discourse to be infelicitous if, because of other constraints, one of the markedly less salient antecedents must be linked with the pronoun. We also briefly consider the applications of our processing model to other definite noun phrases besides anaphoric pronouns
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Peter C. Gordon & Randall Hendrick (1998). The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse. Cognitive Science 22 (4):389-424.
Paul Dekker (1993). Existential Disclosure. Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (6):561 - 587.
Similar books and articles
Hub Prüst, Remko Scha & Martin Berg (1994). Discourse Grammar and Verb Phrase Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 17 (3):261-327.
Johan Bos (2004). Computational Semantics in Discourse: Underspecification, Resolution, and Inference. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):139-157.
Peter Turney (1990). Embeddability, Syntax, and Semantics in Accounts of Scientific Theories. Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (4):429 - 451.
Sebastian Lutz (2014). What's Right with a Syntactic Approach to Theories and Models? Erkenntnis (S8):1-18.
Eric Dietrich (1989). Semantics and the Computational Paradigm in Computational Psychology. Synthese 79 (April):119-41.
Murat Aydede (2000). Computation and Intentional Psychology. Dialogue 39 (2):365-379.
Hans Halvorson (2013). The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic. Philosophy of Science 80 (3):475-478.
Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen & J. P. Smit (2010). Anaphora and Semantic Innocence. Journal of Semantics 27 (1):ffp012.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads11 ( #326,420 of 1,934,580 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,381 of 1,934,580 )
How can I increase my downloads?