Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):15-16 (2005)
|Abstract||The target article postulates that rule-based and similarity-based categorization are best described by a unitary process. A number of recent empirical dissociations between rule-based and similarity-based categorization severely challenge this view. Collectively, these new results provide strong evidence that these two types of category learning are mediated by separate systems.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vladimir M. Sloutsky & Anna V. Fisher (2004). Induction and Categorization in Young Children: A Similarity-Based Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology 133:166-189.
Christopher Woodard (2008). A New Argument Against Rule Consequentialism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (3):247 - 261.
Shimon Edelman & Sharon Duvdevani-Bar (1997). Similarity-Based Viewspace Interpolation and the Categorization of 3D Objects. In Proc. Edinburgh Workshop on Similarity and Categorization.
Bob McMurray & David Gow (2005). It's Not How Many Dimensions You Have, It's What You Do with Them: Evidence From Speech Perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):31-31.
Ulrike Hahn (2005). Is This What the Debate on Rules Was About? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):25-26.
Edward E. Smith (2005). Rule and Similarity as Prototype Concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):34-35.
Emmanuel M. Pothos (2005). The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Evan Heit & Brett K. Hayes (2005). Illuminating Reasoning and Categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):27-27.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 731,540 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?