Understanding double mystery: Daoism in early Tang as mirrored in the fdlh (t 2104) and chongxuanxue
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):427–440 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBernard S. Strauss (2004). Rosy and Jim: The Mystery of the Double Helix. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47 (3):443-448.
David B. Wong (2009). Identifying with Nature in Early Daoism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (4):568-584.
Ronnie Littlejohn & Jeffrey Dippmann (eds.) (2011). Riding the Wind With Liezi: New Perspectives on the Daoist Classic. State University of New York.
Thomas Poynor (2008). “How Can These Things Be?”. Newman Studies Journal 5 (1):51-62.
Koji Tanaka (2004). The Limit of Language in Daoism. Asian Philosophy 14 (2):191 – 205.
Steven D. Boyer (2007). The Logic of Mystery. Religious Studies 43 (1):89-102.
Friederike Assandri (2010). Introduction: Daoism and Hermeneutics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37 (3):341-345.
Remy Debes (2010). Which Empathy? Limitations in the Mirrored “Understanding” of Emotion. Synthese 175 (2):219-239.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #122,917 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
