David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Hobbes Studies 24 (1):5-14 (2011)
In this brief article I expound some uses that Hobbes gave to the concept of multitude. Firstly, I explain the distinction between "people" and "multitude", the confusion of which was regarded in De Cive as a cause of sedition. The plural and disunited character of the multitude is highlighted, in comparison with the unity that constitutes the people. Secondly, I show that Hobbes, beyond the cited distinction, makes a relevant use in Leviathan of the principle of representation, in order to show the way in which multitude becomes State. Finally, I highlight the two-fold use given by the author to such concept: on the one hand, by attributing a theoretical role to it, which should allow thinking of the rational construction of the State; on the other, by showing the historical reality of multitude, turned into a source of madness and sedition
|Keywords||REPRESENTATION STATE PEOPLE SEDITION MULTITUDE|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau (eds.) (2004). Leviathan After 350 Years. Oxford University Press.
Aris Stilianou (2012). Historicité, multitude et démocratie. Astérion. Philosophie, Histoire des Idées, Pensée Politique 10 (10).
Severin V. Kitanov (2012). Happiness in a Mechanistic Universe: Thomas Hobbes on the Nature and Attainability of Happiness. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):117-136.
Matthew E. Moore (2007). The Genesis of the Peircean Continuum. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (3):425 - 469.
Michel Malherbe (1996). Hobbes Et la Mort du Léviathan: Opinion, Sédition Et Dissolution. Hobbes Studies 9 (1):11-20.
Andres Rosler (2011). Odi Et Amo? Hobbes on the State of Nature. Hobbes Studies 24 (1):91-111.
Kasper Juel Gregersen (2012). Coining Collective Identities: The Multitude in De Cive and Tractatus Politicus. SATS 13 (2):170-189.
Patricia Sheridan (2012). Resisting the Scaffold: Self-Preservation and Limits of Obligation in Hobbes's Leviathan. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):137-157.
Christine Chwaszcza (2012). The Seat of Sovereignty: Hobbes on the Artificial Person of the Commonwealth or State. Hobbes Studies 25 (2):123-142.
Markus Fischer (2012). The Book of Lord Shang Compared with Machiavelli and Hobbes. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (2):201-221.
Norberto Bobbio (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
Maria L. Lukac De Stier (1997). Hobbes on Authority De Cive and Leviathan : A Comparison. Hobbes Studies 10 (1):51-67.
Added to index2011-06-19
Total downloads22 ( #74,525 of 1,096,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #23,503 of 1,096,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?