Techné 10 (1):16-29 (2006)
|Abstract||Technological developments often bring about new risks. Informed consent has been proposed as a means to legitimize the imposition of technological risks. This principle was first introduced in medical practice to assure the autonomy of the patient.The introduction of IC in the field of technological practice raises questions about the comparability of the type of informed consent. To what extent are thepossibilities to include laypeople in making decisions regarding risks similar in the technological field to giving informed consent in the medical field and whatdoes this imply for the design and implementation of IC in the technological field? Medical and the technological practice are clearly alike in that both fieldsare characterized by highly specialized, technical knowledge which can be quite inaccessible to the average layperson. However, a fundamental difference ariseswith regard to the aim, knowledge of risks and exclusiveness of the practices in each field. The differences in aim imply that the necessity for each practice isperceived differently by laypeople, thus leading them to assess the respective risks differently. The differences in knowledge of risks arise from the variabilityin the ways that can be used to describe a given risk. Definition of risk in medical practice is more homogenous in this respect than the risk definition intechnological fields. Futhermore, medical practice tends to be more exclusive, leading laypeople immersed in that practice to necessarily embrace most of thefundamental underlying that practice. These differences result in divergent recommendations for the implementation of informed consent in the technological field, basically: there is a need for more extensive procedure and for less decisive authority for the individual|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Deborah Bowman (2011). Informed Consent: A Primer for Clinical Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Jukka Varelius (2010). On Taylor's Justification of Medical Informed Consent. Bioethics 26 (4):207-214.
Ingemar Nordin (2000). Expert and Non-Expert Knowledge in Medical Practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):295-302.
Dennis John Mazur (1998). Medical Risk and the Right to an Informed Consent in Clinical Care and Clinical Research. American College of Physician Executives.
Erika Yu & Ruiping Fan (2007). A Confucian View of Personhood and Bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):171-179.
Janice R. Dillon (1981). Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Risks of Treatment: The Supreme Court of Canada Decides. [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 3 (3-4):156-162.
David B. Annis (1984). Informed Consent, Autonomy, and the Law. Philosophy Research Archives 10:249-259.
Jerome Bickenbach (2012). Argumentation and Informed Consent in the Doctor–Patient Relationship. Journal of Argumentaion in Context 1 (1):5-18.
Sheila McLean (2010). Autonomy, Consent and the Law. Routledge-Cavendish.
Eugene V. Boisaubin (2004). Observations of Physician, Patient and Family Perceptions of Informed Consent in Houston, Texas. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):225 – 236.
Emmanuel R. Ezeome & Patricia A. Marshall (2009). Informed Consent Practices in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):138-148.
Rachel E. Dew (2007). Informed Consent for Research in Borderline Personality Disorder. BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-4.
Tom Walker (2013). Respecting Autonomy Without Disclosing Information. Bioethics 27 (7):388-394.
Edmund Erde (1999). A Commentary on 'Informed Consent to Septoplasty: An Anecdote From the Field'. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):18 – 27.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #245,513 of 722,699 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?