David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoria 53 (111):87-107 (2006)
The consent theory of power, whereby ruling elites depend ultimately on the submission, cooperation and obedience of the governed as their source of power, is often linked to debates about the effectiveness of non-violent political action. According to this theory, ruling elites depend ultimately on the submission, cooperation and obedience of the governed as their source of power. If this cooperation is with-drawn, then this power is undermined. Iain Atack outlines this theory and examines its strengths and weaknesses. Atack argues that incorporating the insights of other theories of power, such as Gramsci's theory of hegemony and Foucault's views on 'micro-power', can provide us with a more sophisticated understanding of both the effectiveness and the limits of nonviolent political action than the consent theory of power. Gramsci's contribution deepens the analysis in terms of our understanding of the origins of individual consent in the context of larger economic and political structures, while Foucault adds a different dimension, in that his micro-approach emphasizes the ubiquity and plurality of power, rather than its embodiment or reification in large-scale structures.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel Schwartz (2008). Francisco Suárez on Consent and Political Obligation. Vivarium 46 (1):59-81.
David R. Hiley (1987). Power and Values in Corporate Life. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):343 - 353.
Jukka Varelius (2009). Collective Informed Consent and Decision Power. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):39-50.
Andrew Garnar (2006). Power, Action, Signs: Between Peirce and Foucault. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):347-366.
Benda Hofmeyr (2006). The Power Not to Be (What We Are): The Politics and Ethics of Self-Creation in Foucault. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (2):215-230.
Susanne Sreedhar (2010). Hobbes on Resistance. Cambridge University Press.
Stefan Grotefeld (2000). Self-Restraint and the Principle of Consent: Some Considerations of the Liberal Conception of Political Legitmacy. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):77-92.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #77,729 of 1,696,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #177,960 of 1,696,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?