Locke on essences and classification
In Lex Newman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Locke's "Essay Concerning Human Understanding". Cambridge University Press (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper '+r+'').show() })">Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas Odegard (1971). Locke, Geach, and Individual Essences. Philosophical Studies 22 (5-6):70 - 73.
R. S. Woolhouse (1973). Locke, Geach, and Individuals' Essences. Philosophical Studies 24 (3):204 - 207.
K. C. Barclay (1967). Geach, Locke, and Nominal Essences. Philosophical Studies 18 (5):78 - 80.
Michael T. Ghiselin (1998). Folk Metaphysics and the Anthropology of Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):573-574.
Nicholas Jolley (1999). Locke: His Philosophical Thought. Oxford University Press.
Nigel Leary (2009). How Essentialists Misunderstand Locke. History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (3):273-292.
Brandon C. Look (2009). Leibniz and Locke on Natural Kinds. In Vlad Alexandrescu (ed.), Branching Off: The Early Moderns in Quest for the Unity of Knowledge. Zeta Books.
Jan-Erik Jones (2005). Boyle, Classification and the Workmanship of the Understanding Thesis. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Jan-Erik Jones (2010). Locke on Real Essences, Intelligibility and Natural Kinds. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:147-172.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
