David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 46 (01):239- (1996)
The grammarians of antiquity, unlike some of their modern counterparts, seem to have had little interest in investigating ‘what every speaker knows’, at least as a largescale project, consciously articulated and embarked on. The object of such a project would be to determine what constitutes such knowledge—or mastery, or cognition, or whatever name it is given—in actual speakers. An alternative goal would be an account of something knowledge of which would count as knowledge of the language in question, even if this is not what actual speakers know. No ancient author seems to have set himself either task; indeed, the whole question of what it is to know a language seems to have been raised only very occasionally in classical antiquity. is probably the best known of these rare discussions.) Kaimio is surely justified in making the still more sweeping observation that ‘The concept of language knowledge was rather vague amongst ancient peoples’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
B. O. G. (1977). The New Grammarian's Funeral. Review of Metaphysics 30 (4):772-773.
E. Laughton (1956). Varro the Grammarian. The Classical Review 6 (01):38-.
Sonia Argyle (1989). A New Greek Grammarian. Classical Quarterly 39 (02):524-.
H. A. Strong (1911). On the Grammarian, Virgilius Maro. The Classical Review 25 (03):70-71.
F. H. Colson (1920). A Note on an Old Grammarian, with a Correction. The Classical Review 34 (1-2):28-30.
H. A. Strong (1911). Excerpta From the Vocabulary of the Grammarian Virgilius Maro. The Classical Review 25 (07):201-202.
Thomas Basbøll (2005). Configuring the Usage: The Social Epistemologist as a Postmodern Grammarian. Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (3):259 - 268.
Thomas Basboll (2005). Configuring the Usage: The Social Epistemologist as a Postmodern Grammarian. Philosophy and Rhetoric 38 (3):259 - 268.
Roger North (2006). Roger North's the Musicall Grammarian: 1728. Cambridge University Press.
Alexandra Aikhenvald (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Chien-Hsing Ho (2014). Meaning, Understanding, and Knowing-What: An Indian Grammarian Notion of Intuition (Pratibha). Philosophy East and West 64 (2):404-424.
J. N. Adams (1991). Grammarians in Late Antiquity Robert A. Kaster: Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity. (The Transformation of the Classical Heritage, 11.) Pp. Xxi + 524. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press, 1988. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):97-101.
Saroja Bhate & Johannes Bronkhorst (eds.) (1992). Bhartr̥hari, Philosopher and Grammarian: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bhartr̥hari (University of Poona, January 6-8, 1992). [REVIEW] Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Paul Edward Dutton (2005). Filiolitas. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):549-566.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads2 ( #511,927 of 1,699,550 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,699,550 )
How can I increase my downloads?