Graduate studies at Western
Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):407-416 (2010)
|Abstract||In an earlier paper we have shown that a proposition can have a well-defined probability value, even if its justification consists of an infinite linear chain. In the present paper we demonstrate that the same holds if the justification takes the form of a closed loop. Moreover, in the limit that the size of the loop tends to infinity, the probability value of the justified proposition is always well-defined, whereas this is not always so for the infinite linear chain. This suggests that infinitism sits more comfortably with a coherentist view of justification than with an approach in which justification is portrayed as a linear process|
|Keywords||probabilistic justification coherentism infinitism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg (2012). Fractal Patterns in Reasoning. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (1):15-26.
Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson (2008). Probabilistic Justification and the Regress Problem. Studia Logica 89 (3):333 - 341.
Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson (2011). Grounds and Limits: Reichenbach and Foundationalist Epistemology. Synthese 181 (1):113 - 124.
Frederik Herzberg (forthcoming). The Dialectics of Infinitism and Coherentism: Inferential Justification Versus Holism and Coherence. Synthese:1-23.
Declan Smithies (2012). Moore's Paradox and the Accessibility of Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2):273-300.
David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg (2009). Justification by an Infinity of Conditional Probabilities. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 50 (2):183-193.
Stephen Wright (2013). Does Klein's Infinitism Offer a Response to Agrippa's Trilemma? Synthese 190 (6):1113-1130.
Jeremy Gwiazda (2011). Infinitism, Completability, and Computability: Reply to Peijnenburg. Mind 119 (476):1123-1124.
Andrew D. Cling (2004). The Trouble with Infinitism. Synthese 138 (1):101 - 123.
Frederik Herzberg (2010). The Consistency of Probabilistic Regresses. A Reply to Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson. Studia Logica 94 (3):331 - 345.
Oliver Black (1996). Legal Validity and the Infinite Regress. Law and Philosophy 15 (4):339 - 368.
Jeanne Peijnenburg (2007). Infinitism Regained. Mind 116 (463):597 - 602.
Robert Audi (1991). Structural Justification. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:473-492.
Ram Neta (2007). Propositional Justification, Evidence, and the Cost of Error. Philosophical Issues 17 (1):197–216.
William A. Roche (2010). Coherentism, Truth, and Witness Agreement. Acta Analytica 25 (2):243-257.
Added to index2010-09-30
Total downloads58 ( #20,294 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,232 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?