Virtue blindness and hegemony: Qualitative evidence of negotiated ethical frameworks in the social language of university research administration
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (2):195-220 (2007)
The study used critical discourse analysis (CDA) to elucidate normative structures of ethical behavior in university research administration which may be useful for knowledge transference to future studies of research integrity. Research administration appears to support integrity in the research environment through four very strong normative domains: (1) respect for authority structures; (2) respect for institutional boundaries; (3) professionalism; and (4) a strong sense of virtue. The strong norm structure of research administration, however, appears to be threatened by the fifth domain, (5) political power, which is inhabited by prestigious faculty with tenure, top-down authority misalignment, and the power for some institutional members to circumvent the system. The strong normative structure also appears threatened by the overall consequentiality of the regulatory environment, and shifting contexts that threaten personal virtue. In the end, the normative structure is fluid, politically acquiescent to power, and ambiguous. Although the professional core of the norm structure is strong, the strengths and weaknesses in the overall system can be connected to poorly constructed elements of the institutional environment.
|Keywords||Norms Ethics Integrity Discourse Conjuncture Institutionalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bernard Barber (1978). Science and the Social Order. Greenwood Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Deborah S. Mower (2013). Situationism and Confucian Virtue Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):113-137.
Gary Allen (2008). Getting Beyond Form Filling: The Role of Institutional Governance in Human Research Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
Joan E. E. Sieber (2005). Evidence-Based Ethical Problem Solving: An Idea Whose Time has Come. [REVIEW] Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):113-125.
Shannon Vallor (2010). Social Networking Technology and the Virtues. Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):157-170.
Mohit Bhattacharya (2006). Social Theory, Development Administration, and Development Ethics. Jawahar Publishers & Distributors.
Charles M. Chambers (1981). Foundations of Ethical Responsibility in Higher Education Administration. In Ronald H. Stein & M. Carlota Baca (eds.), Professional Ethics in University Administration. Jossey-Bass.
Joan E. Sieber (2004). Empirical Research on Research Ethics. Ethics and Behavior 14 (4):397 – 412.
LaRue Tone Hosmer (1999). Somebody Out There Doesn't Like Us: A Study of the Position and Respect of Business Ethics at Schools of Business Administration. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (2):91 - 106.
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos & William E. Smythe (2001). Elements of Risk in Qualitative Research. Ethics and Behavior 11 (2):163 – 174.
T. Libby & L. Thorne (2007). The Development of a Measure of Auditors' Virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):89 - 99.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #172,027 of 1,696,513 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #79,559 of 1,696,513 )
How can I increase my downloads?