Responsible conduct by life scientists in an age of terrorism
Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3) (2009)
| Abstract | The potential for dual use of research in the life sciences to be misused for harm raises a range of problems for the scientific community and policy makers. Various legal and ethical strategies are being implemented to reduce the threat of the misuse of research and knowledge in the life sciences by establishing a culture of responsible conduct. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLawrence J. Rhoades (2002). Beyond Conflict of Interest: The Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3).
Nancy L. Jones (2007). A Code of Ethics for the Life Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1).
David Hodgson (2007). Making Our Own Luck. Ratio 20 (3):278–292.
Caroline Whitebeck (2001). Group Mentoring to Foster the Responsible Conduct of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4).
Michael J. Selgelid (2009). Dual-Use Research Codes of Conduct: Lessons From the Life Sciences. Nanoethics 3 (3):175-183.
Edward J. Hackett (2002). Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2).
Victoria Sutton (2009). Smarter Regulations Commentary on “Responsible Conduct by Life Scientists in an Age of Terrorism”. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):303-309.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-05-09Total downloads17 ( #71,134 of 549,119 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,119 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
