Pre-theoretical aspects of Aristotelian definition and classification of animals: The case for common sense

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    D. M. Balme (1980). Aristotle's Biology Was Not Essentialist. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1):1-12.

    View all 25 references

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    R. I. Aaron (1958). The Common Sense View of Sense-Perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-14.
    Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu (2010). Moral Transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (6):656-669.
    Eike von Savigny (1976). Das normative Fundament der Sprache. Grazer Philosophische Studien 2:141-158.
    Stanley Rosen (2000). Common Sense and the Goodness of Truth. Philosophical Explorations 3 (3):244 – 261.
    Ben Mepham (2000). ``Würde der Kreatur'' and the Common Morality. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):65-78.
    Barry Dainton (2008). Sensing Change. Philosophical Issues 18 (1):362-384.
    Leslie Forman & Wendy Wakefield Davis (1994). Dsm-IV Meets Philosophy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3):207-218.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    3 ( #224,045 of 1,088,810 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.