Levinas Studies 2:105-132 (2007)
|Abstract||Discussions of the sources for Levinas’s philosophy have tended to focus on Greece and the Bible to the neglect of his Russo-Lithuanian cultural heritage. Almost no work has been done examining the impact of Russian literature on Levinas’s thinking. The present essay seeks to overcome this neglect by examining the influence that Dostoyevsky in particular exerted on the development of Levinas’s philosophy. I am aware that the notion of “influence” is philosophically vague, and not something whose truth can easily be ascertained. Might there be nothing more than simply a confluence between the thinking of Dostoyevsky and that of Levinas? Could it be that Levinas was attracted to the work of Dostoyevsky because he found there what he was already looking for? Although Levinas credits Dostoyevsky with introducing him to philosophy, it would be facile to draw the conclusion that St. Petersburg occupies as important a place in Levinas’s intellectual itinerary as Athens or Jerusalem. Dostoyevsky provided neither an ontology nor any of the “pre-philosophical experiences” (EI 24) on which, according to Levinas, all philosophical thought rests. But he did give Levinas a way to think about art, religion, and, most importantly of all, ethics after the Holocaust, an event that more than any other, according to Levinas, demonstrated the absolute failure of philosophical theodicy. It was Dostoyevsky, I submit, rather than the Bible, the Greeks, or Kant who taught Levinas that the moral imperative, addressed to the singular existing individual, supersedes the religious imperative, whose validity is placed in question by the suffering of innocents and the absence of the all-powerful and providential God of theism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak (ed.) (1995). Ethics as First Philosophy: The Significance of Emmanuel Levinas for Philosophy, Literature, and Religion. Routledge.
Nicholas H. Smith (2008). Levinas, Habermas and Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):643-664.
Ephraim Meir (2008). Levinas's Jewish Thought: Between Jerusalem and Athens. The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
Theodorus de Boer (1997). The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. J.C. Gieben.
Tina Chanter (2001). Time, Death, and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Michael Purcell (2006). Levinas and Theology. Cambridge University.
Bettina Bergo (2008). A Site From Which to Hope? Levinas Studies 3:117-142.
Silvia Benso (2008). Aesth-Ethics. Epoché 13 (1):163-183.
William Edelglass (2006). Levinas on Suffering and Compassion. Sophia 45 (2):43-59.
Rockwell F. Clancy (2013). Human Nature and Holocaust: Understanding Levinas's Account of Ethics Through Levi and Wiesel. Philosophy and Literature 36 (2):330-346.
Matthew T. Eggemeier (2012). Lévinas and Ricoeur on the Possibility of God After the End of Theodicy. Philosophy and Theology 24 (1):23-48.
Michael L. Morgan (2005). Levinas and Judaism. Levinas Studies 1:1-17.
David R. Harrington (2000). Levinas, Theistic Language, and Psychology. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 7 (1):53-58.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-03-18
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?