Graduate studies at Western
Theory and Decision 73 (1):125-160 (2012)
|Abstract||In this article, ambiguity attitude is measured through the maximum price a decision maker is willing to pay to know the probability of an event. Two problems are examined in which the decision maker faces an act: in one case, buying information implies playing a lottery, while, in the other case, buying information gives also the option to avoid playing the lottery. In both decision settings, relying on the Choquet expected utility model, we study how the decision maker’s risk and ambiguity attitudes affect the reservation price for ambiguity resolution. These effects are analyzed for different levels of ambiguity of the act. Operating instructions for the elicitation of the reservation price for ambiguity resolution in an experimental setting are provided at the end of the article.|
|Keywords||Ambiguity aversion Choquet expected utility Information about probabilities Reservation price for ambiguity resolution Option value|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
W. Kip Viscusi & Harrell Chesson (1999). Hopes and Fears: The Conflicting Effects of Risk Ambiguity. Theory and Decision 47 (2):157-184.
Giovanni B. Moneta (1991). Ambiguity, Inductive Systems, and the Modeling of Subjective Probability Judgements. Philosophical Psychology 4 (2):267 – 285.
Ebbe Groes, Hans Jørgen Jacobsen, Birgitte Sloth & Torben Tranaes (1998). Nash Equilibrium with Lower Probabilities. Theory and Decision 44 (1):37-66.
Hans Gersbach (1997). Risk and the Value of Information in Irreversible Decisions. Theory and Decision 42 (1):37-51.
David L. Mclain & John P. Keenan (1999). Risk, Information, and the Decision About Response to Wrongdoing in an Organization. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (3):255 - 271.
Francisco J. Vázquez & Richard Watt (2002). The Price of Risk with Incomplete Knowledge on the Utility Function. Theory and Decision 53 (3):271-287.
Aldo Montesano (2001). Uncertainty with Partial Information on the Possibility of the Events. Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):183-195.
Paola Ferretti, Temporal Risk Aversion: What Determines the Attitude of the Decision Maker? The Case of the Buyer Decision Maker.
Brendan S. Gillon (1990). Ambiguity, Generality, and Indeterminacy: Tests and Definitions. [REVIEW] Synthese 85 (3):391 - 416.
Jonathan Kimmelman (2011). Ethics, Ambiguity Aversion, and the Review of Complex Translational Clinical Trials. Bioethics 26 (5):242-250.
Richard Kaye (1991). A Generalization of Specker's Theorem on Typical Ambiguity. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Barbara Osimani (2012). Risk Information Processing and Rational Ignoring in the Health Context. Journal of Socio-Economics 41:169-179.
Harrell W. Chesson & W. Kip Viscusi (2003). Commonalities in Time and Ambiguity Aversion for Long-Term Risks. Theory and Decision 54 (1):57-71.
Added to index2011-07-13
Total downloads15 ( #86,109 of 740,703 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,452 of 740,703 )
How can I increase my downloads?