Graduate studies at Western
British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):81-84 (2010)
|Abstract||The Philosophy of Literature offers an opportunity to consider the gap between the analytic and the continental traditions of aesthetics. In particular, Lamarque's survey fails to take account of the possibility that literature is an institution and a practice that challenges the conventions of instrumental rationality, a position held by a number of continental philosophers who have written on art. It also pays little attention to the reader's experience of the inventiveness of the literary work, preferring to represent the reading of literature as a matter of conventions confirmed. An alternative understanding of the literary work as an event that opens up new possibilities for the reader, put forward in the author's recent book, The Singularity of Literature, is sketched|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gerald L. Bruns (1999). Tragic Thoughts at the End of Philosophy: Language, Literature, and Ethical Theory. Northwestern University Press.
Frank Palmer (1992). Literature and Moral Understanding: A Philosophical Essay on Ethics, Aesthetics, Education, and Culture. Clarendon Press.
Garry Hagberg & Walter Jost (eds.) (2010). A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
Stein Haugom Olsen (1978). The Structure of Literary Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Rita Felski (2008). Uses of Literature. Blackwell Pub..
Stein Haugom Olsen (1987). The End of Literary Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-01-09
Total downloads29 ( #48,178 of 739,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,537 )
How can I increase my downloads?