Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):607 – 623 (1999)
|Abstract||The Harvard Report, published in April 1999 for public consultation in Hong Kong, proposed a fundamental restructuring in its health care delivery and financing systems. The Report claims to be evidence-based in its approach (Hsiao et al., 1999a). While 'evidence' has been widely collected by the consultancy team through surveys, consultations and focus groups, the recommendations put forth are not value-free. They carry clear ideological preferences. The value assumptions and ethical presuppositions underlying the report are discussed in this paper. The Harvard consultancy study is in favor of a positive government role in regulation and control, a single central body to administer compulsory health insurance for all citizens, and a purchaser-provider split to induce competition. Such preference is based on pre-existing ideology and generic health care management concepts, which are still in the experimental phase internationally. While value and ideology are inevitable factors in any policy choice, the challenge is to lay these values open for reflection and public debate. For Hong Kong, the challenge is also to take on local substantive issues in health care and deal with them head-on, rather than putting hope in a universal, generic solution|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
F. Cheng, Mary Ip, K. K. Wong & W. W. Yan (1998). Critical Care Ethics in Hong Kong: Cross-Cultural Conflicts as East Meets West. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):616 – 627.
Madison Powers (1997). Managed Care: How Economic Incentive Reforms Went Wrong. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
Lorian E. Hardcastle, Katherine L. Record, Peter D. Jacobson & Lawrence O. Gostin (2011). Improving the Population's Health: The Affordable Care Act and the Importance of Integration. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):317-327.
Ruiping Fan (2002). Reconstructionist Confucianism and Health Care: An Asian Moral Account of Health Care Resource Allocation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):675 – 682.
Ruiping Fan (1999). Freedom, Responsibility, and Care: Hong Kong's Health Care Reform. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):555 – 570.
Chan Ho-mun (1999). Free Choice, Equity, and Care: The Moral Foundations of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):624 – 637.
Jack Ka Cheong Chun (1999). Power of Politics and Reasonableness in Policy Study: On Some Methodological Problems with the Harvard Team Report. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):591 – 606.
Julia Tao Lai Po-wah (1999). Does It Really Care? The Harvard Report on Health Care Reform for Hong Kong. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):571 – 590.
Hong Fung, Nancy Tse & E. K. Yeoh (1999). Health Care Reform and Societal Values. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):638 – 652.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #291,948 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?