Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 25 (2):437-454 (2010)
|Abstract||The logical empiricists often appear as a foil for feminist theories. Their emphasis on the individualistic nature of knowledge and on the value-neutrality of science seems directly opposed to most feminist concerns. However, several recent works have highlighted aspects of Carnap's views that make him seem like much less of a straightforwardly positivist thinker. Certain of these aspects lend themselves to feminist concerns much more than the stereotypical picture would imply|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gregory Lavers (2008). Carnap, Formalism, and Informal Rigour. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (1):4-24.
S. Awodey & A. W. Carus (2007). Carnap's Dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax. Synthese 159 (1):23-45.
Thomas Oberdan (2005). Carnap's Conventionalism: The Problem with P-Rules. Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):119-137.
Robert Hudson (2010). Carnap, the Principle of Tolerance, and Empiricism. Philosophy of Science 77 (3):341-358.
Bryan G. Norton (1977). On the Metatheoretical Nature of Carnap's Philosophy. Philosophy of Science 44 (1):65-85.
Matthew C. Haug (2011). On the Prospects for Ontology: Deflationism, Pluralism, and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2).
Audrey Yap (2010). Feminism and Carnap's Principle of Tolerance. Hypatia 25 (2):437 - 454.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads42 ( #31,739 of 739,315 )
Recent downloads (6 months)31 ( #3,848 of 739,315 )
How can I increase my downloads?