David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 53 (2):241-252 (2012)
Patristics is a lively scholarly domain in which theologians and historians contribute to the study of Christian antiquity. But modern trends in patristic study (especially the application of contemporary critical theory to ancient sources) are not always conducive to theological research. This paper identifies the preoccupation in modern patristic study with heresy as a major source of problems. The modern study of Evagrius Ponticus (c. 345–99) provides an exemplary case in which some of these problems can be identified and explored. The initial presentation of modern scholarship will bring into focus the way that Evagrius' relationship to the sixth-century condemnations of Origenism is interpreted by most scholars. Next, the paper identifies and evaluates recent indications that Evagrius is prized precisely because he is considered a heretic. In the final section of the paper, attention is paid to the problem of presuming that subsequent events disclose the theological meaning of earlier writings and to the problem of foreclosing independent theological assessment in order to preserve ancient condemnations. The conclusions suggest that preoccupations with alleged heresy can be every bit as detrimental to understanding of theological writings as preoccupations with orthodoxy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Neville Richardson (1986). Apartheid, Heresy and the Church in South Africa. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):1 - 21.
Daniel Haynes (2011). The Metaphysics of Christian Ethics: Radical Orthodoxy and Theosis. Heythrop Journal 52 (4):659-671.
R. N. Swanson (2008). Heresy in Transition: Transforming Ideas of Heresy in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Edited by Ian Hunter, John Christian Laursen, and Cary J. Nederman. Heythrop Journal 49 (6):1076-1077.
Derek Michaud (2011). The Patristic Roots of John Smith’s True Way or Method of Attaining to Divine Knowledge. In Thomas Cattoi & June McDaniel (eds.), Perceiving the Divine through the Human Body: Mystical Sensuality. Palgrave Macmillan.
James F. Moore (2010). Evagrius Ponticus and Cognitive Science: A Look at Moral Evil and the Thoughts. By George Tsakiridis. Zygon 45 (4):1024-1025.
Norman Russell (2006). Modern Greek Theologians and the Greek Fathers. Philosophy and Theology 18 (1):77-92.
Jeremy Driscoll (1990). A Key for Reading the Ad Monachos of Evagrius Ponticus. Augustinianum 30 (2):361-392.
Susanna Elm (1990). The Sententiae Ad Virginem by Evagrius Ponticus and the Problem of Early Monastic Rules. Augustinianum 30 (2):393-404.
Robert C. Hill (2007). Psalmody and Prayer in the Writings of Evagrius Ponticus. By Luke Dysinger, OSB. Heythrop Journal 48 (2):287–288.
Anthony Meredith (2008). Evagrius Ponticus (the Early Church Fathers). By A. M. Casiday. Heythrop Journal 49 (2):327–328.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads16 ( #103,997 of 1,102,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,643 of 1,102,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?