Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):221-248 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper provides an account of Kierkegaard’s central criticism of the Danish Hegelians. Contrary to recent scholarship, it is argued that this criticism has a substantive theoretical basis and is not merely personal or ad hominem in nature. In particular, Kierkegaard is seen as criticizing the Hegelians for endorsing an unacceptable form of intellectual elitism, one that gives them pride of place in the realm of religion by dint of their philosophical knowledge. A problem arises, however, because this criticism threatens to apply to Kierkegaard himself. It is shown that Kierkegaard manages to escape this problem by virtue of the humorous aspect of his work.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Gregor Malantschuk (1980). The Controversial Kierkegaard. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Michelle Kosch (2006). Kierkegaard's Ethicist: Fichte's Role in Kierkegaard's Construction of the Ethical Standpoint. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (3):261-295.
John Lippitt (2003). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kierkegaard and Fear and Trembling. Routledge.
Antony Aumann (2010). Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication, the Crowd, and a Monstrous Illusion. In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Point of View. Mercer University Press.
Ingmar Pörn (1984). Kierkegaard and the Study of the Self. Inquiry 27 (1-4):199-205.
Ingmar Pörn (1984). Kierkegaard and the Study of the Self. Inquiry 27 (1-4):199 – 205.
Antony Aumann (2006). Sartre's View of Kierkegaard as Transhistorical Man. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:361-372.
Jon Stewart (2003). Kierkegaard's Relations to Hegel Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-05-30
Total downloads59 ( #16,405 of 549,067 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,067 )
How can I increase my downloads?