Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication, the Crowd, and a Monstrous Illusion
In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Point of View. Mercer University Press (2010)
| Abstract | Following the pattern set by the early German Romantics, Kierkegaard conveys many of his insights through literature rather than academic prose. What makes him a valuable member of this tradition is the theory he develops to support it, his so-called “theory of indirect communication.” The most exciting aspect of this theory concerns the alleged importance of indirect communication: Kierkegaard claims that there are some projects only it can accomplish. This paper provides a critical account of two arguments Kierkegaard offers in defense of this claim. The first argument is that he needs to use indirect communication in order to discourage people from losing themselves in the “crowd”. The second argument is that he needs to use it in order to help people out of a “monstrous illusion”. It is shown that while both arguments justify Kierkegaard’s decision to use indirect communication, neither one supports the original claim about its indispensability. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Kierkegaard Indirect Communication Christendom Self-Deception Authenticity | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid A. Borman (2006). Betrayal in Teaching: Persuasion in Kierkegaard, Theory and Performance. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):245-272.
Brayton Polka (2005). Who is the Single Individual?: On the Religious and the Secular in Kierkegaard. Philosophy and Theology 17 (1/2):157-175.
J. Kellenberger (1984). Kierkegaard, Indirect Communication, and Religious Truth. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (2):153 - 160.
C. Stephen Evans (2009). Kierkegaard: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Jolita Pons (2004). Stealing a Gift: Kierkegaard's Pseudonyms and the Bible. Fordham University Press.
Jamie Turnbull (2009). Kierkegaard, Indirect Communication, and Ambiguity. Heythrop Journal 50 (1):13-22.
Harry S. Broudy (1961). Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication. Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):225-233.
Youru Wang (2000). The Pragmatics of 'Never Tell Too Plainly': Indirect Communication in Chan Buddhism. Asian Philosophy 10 (1):7 – 31.
Vanessa Rumble (1995). To Be as No-One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
Antony Aumann (2008). Kierkegaard on the Need for Indirect Communication. Dissertation, Indiana University
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-12-07Total downloads54 ( #18,804 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)32 ( #1,291 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
