A case of vyākaraṇic oxymoroṇ: The notion of anvarthasaṃjñā [Book Review]

Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (2):133-147 (2007)
The anvartha-saṃjñā compound associates two contradictory terms: anvartha, which means “[used] in conformity with his [etymological/first] meaning”, and saṃjñā which implies the idea of a convention; it therefore appears to be quite intriguing. The question is: is it relevant to focus on this contradiction or is it only a false problem? The aim of this paper is to answer the above question and this implies to grasp somewhat better the use of this notion by the Pāṇinian grammarians. To do so, the author has studied the main texts of the Pāṇinian tradition, having in mind the following questions: did the Pāṇinian grammarians deal with this notion and, if so, in what terms? Did they perceive the contradiction raised by the association of the terms anvartha and samjñā? The study will show that this contradiction is only a false problem: according to the Pāṇinian grammarians quoted above, even when a saṃjñā is provided with an etymological/first meaning and its bearer (or one of its properties) is partly described by this meaning, this saṃjñā belongs, above all, to the domain of convention
Keywords anvarthasaṃjñā  vyākaraṇa  Pāṇinian grammatical tradition  metalanguage  conventional meaning  etymological meaning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-007-9011-y
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,476
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
K. Kunjunni Raja (1969). Indian Theories of Meaning. Agents, Theosophical Publishing House.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Gary Selnow (1996). Oxymoron. Business Ethics 10 (5):43-43.
Gyula Klima (2000). Aquinas on One and Many. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 11:195-215.
Igal Kvart (1994). Causal Independence. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
David Korten (1996). Oxymoron. Business Ethics 10 (3):61-61.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

27 ( #150,030 of 1,911,741 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #180,473 of 1,911,741 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.