David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (2):133-147 (2007)
The anvartha-saṃjñā compound associates two contradictory terms: anvartha, which means “[used] in conformity with his [etymological/first] meaning”, and saṃjñā which implies the idea of a convention; it therefore appears to be quite intriguing. The question is: is it relevant to focus on this contradiction or is it only a false problem? The aim of this paper is to answer the above question and this implies to grasp somewhat better the use of this notion by the Pāṇinian grammarians. To do so, the author has studied the main texts of the Pāṇinian tradition, having in mind the following questions: did the Pāṇinian grammarians deal with this notion and, if so, in what terms? Did they perceive the contradiction raised by the association of the terms anvartha and samjñā? The study will show that this contradiction is only a false problem: according to the Pāṇinian grammarians quoted above, even when a saṃjñā is provided with an etymological/first meaning and its bearer (or one of its properties) is partly described by this meaning, this saṃjñā belongs, above all, to the domain of convention
|Keywords||anvarthasaṃjñā vyākaraṇa Pāṇinian grammatical tradition metalanguage conventional meaning etymological meaning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
K. Kunjunni Raja (1969). Indian Theories of Meaning. Agents, Theosophical Publishing House.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gary Selnow (1996). Oxymoron. Business Ethics 10 (5):43-43.
Nicholas Xenos (1996). Civic Nationalism: Oxymoron? Critical Review 10 (2):213-231.
Krzysztof Wójtowicz (1998). Unification of Mathematical Theories. Foundations of Science 3 (2):207-229.
Gyula Klima (2000). Aquinas on One and Many. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 11:195-215.
J. J. Moreso (1996). On Relevance and Justification of Legal Decisions. Erkenntnis 44 (1):73 - 100.
Igal Kvart (1994). Causal Independence. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
Alan Hájek & Stephan Hartmann (2010). Bayesian Epistemology. In J. Dancy et al (ed.), A Companion to Epistemology. Blackwell
David Korten (1996). Oxymoron. Business Ethics 10 (3):61-61.
Laura L. Nash (2000). Intensive Care for Everyone's Least Favorite Oxymoron. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):277-290.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #137,372 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #53,688 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?