The influence of anxiety and literature's panglossian nose
Philosophy and Literature 31 (2):215-232 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGöran Hermerén (1975). Influence in Art and Literature. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Olga Pollatos, Eva Traut-Mattausch, Heike Schroeder & Rainer Schandry (2007). Interoceptive Awareness Mediates the Relationship Between Anxiety and the Intensity of Unpleasant Feelings. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21 (7):931-943.
D. Weinstein (2000). Deductive Hedonism and the Anxiety of Influence. Utilitas 12 (03):329-.
Harold Bloom (2011). The Anatomy of Influence: Literature as a Way of Life. Yale University Press.
Alicia M. Evans, David A. Pereira & Judith M. Parker (2008). Occupational Distress in Nursing: A Psychoanalytic Reading of the Literature. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3):195-204.
Andy Denis (2002). Was Hayek a Panglossian Evolutionary Theorist? A Reply to Whitman. Constitutional Political Economy 13 (3):275-285.
William Roger Schultz (2002). Bloom's Theory of Poetry. New Vico Studies 20:45-68.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
