David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
How does aspirin reduce pain and inflammation? How does it prevent heart attacks? Why does it upset the stomach? How do scientists discover the answers? This article examines research and development in the history from willow bark to aspirin to “super aspirins” Celebrex and Vioxx. Scientists adopt various approaches: trial and error, laboratory experiment, clinical test, elucidation of underlying mechanisms, concept-directed research, and rational drug design. Each approach is limited, but they complement each other in unraveling the mystery of a wonder drug.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Matthias Adam (2005). Integrating Research and Development: The Emergence of Rational Drug Design in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 36 (3):513-537.
Jürgen Friedrich (1996). Design Science 97. AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Greg Bamford (2003). Research, Knowledge and Design. In Clare Newton, Sandra Kaj-O'Grady & Simon Wollan (eds.), Design + Research: Project Based Research in Architecture. Second International Conference of the Association of Australasian Schools of Architecture, Melbourne 28 – 30 September, 2003. Association of Architecture Schools of Australasia.
Gregorio Rivera (2003). An Evolutionary Learning Community Network: How Evolutionary Artscience Emerges Through Evolutionary Systems Design. World Futures 59 (8):577 – 584.
Don C. Des Jarlais, Paul A. Gaist & Samuel R. Friedman (1995). Ethical Issues in Research on Preventing HIV Infection Among Injecting Drug Users. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):133-144.
Peter Purgathofer (2006). Is Informatics a Design Discipline? Poiesis and Praxis 4 (4):303-314.
Ulrich Krohs (2009). Functions as Based on a Concept of General Design. Synthese 166 (1):69-89.
William Dembski (2006). In Defence of Intelligent Design. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 715-731.
Dr Edward Lestrade, J. OSt & LLD, European Union Design Protection Law and Design Protection in Europe.
Judy Attfield (ed.) (1999). Utility Reassessed: The Role of Ethics in the Practice of Design. Distributed Exclusively in the Usa by St. Martin's Press.
Arrigo Schieppati, Norberto Perico & Giuseppe Remuzzi (2002). Conflict of Interest as Seen From a Researcher's Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):337-342.
David L. DeMets (1999). Statistics and Ethics in Medical Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (1):97-117.
Jeffrey Koperski (2003). Intelligent Design and the End of Science. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
Hauke F.�Rstenwerth (2003). On Morality and Chemistry. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):53-71.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads17 ( #96,207 of 1,099,034 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #175,277 of 1,099,034 )
How can I increase my downloads?