What is wrong with “technology as applied science?”
| Abstract | Scholars in science and technologies studies talk about a “pure science ideology” or “scientific ideology.” Stereotyping applied science as a dull and mindless practice that generates no new knowledge, the ideology grossly distorts both pure and applied science. What is its origin? | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesThomas Wieland (2006). Scientific Theory and Agricultural Practice: Plant Breeding in Germany From the Late 19th to the Early 20th Century. Journal of the History of Biology 39 (2):309 - 343.
Thomas Hänseroth & Klaus Mauersberger (1998). Technikwissenschaften Zwischen Theoretischer Erkenntnis Und Ingenieurtätigkeit. NTM International Journal of History and Ethics of Natural Sciences, Technology and Medicine 6 (1):217-237.
E. Mamchur (1990). Is There an Ivory Tower in Reality? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):101 – 111.
Sven Ove Hansson (2007). Values in Pure and Applied Science. Foundations of Science 12 (3).
Sami Pihlström (1999). Applied Philosophy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):121-133.
Joseph Agassi (1980). Between Science and Technology. Philosophy of Science 47 (1):82-99.
Margaret Morrison (2006). Applying Science and Applied Science: What's the Difference? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):81 – 91.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,430 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
