Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Edward W. Averill & Bernard Keating (1981). Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics? Mind 90 (January):102-7.In my reading list | Discuss this article | Edit | Categorize |My bibliography
| Export citation | Other links: links.jstor.org jstor.org | Scholar
Discussion of Edward W. Averill & Bernard Keating, Does interactionism violate a law of classical physics?
Nothing in this forum yet.
Similar books and articles
Quantum indeterminism may make available the option of an interactionism that does not have to pay the price of a force over and above those forces that are acknowledged in physics in order to explain how intentions can be physically effective. I show how this option might work in concrete terms and offer a criticism of it.
In my reading list
| Discuss this article | Edit | Categorize | My bibliography | Export citation | Other links: blackwell-synergy.com ingentaconnect.com | Scholar | More..
| | Other links: blackwell-synergy.com ingentaconnect.com | Scholar | More.. One may gather from the arguments of two of the last papers published before his death that J. L. Mackie held the following three theses concerning the mind/body problem : (1) There is a distinct realm of mental properties, so a dualism of properties at least is true and materialism false.
