David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 18:1-13 (1993)
The issue of this paper is the extent to which historicism excludes metaphysics in the contemporary revival of American philosophical pragmatism. I have isolated three types of neo-pragmatism: philosophical, theological, and religious. My theisis is that religious pragmatism is a dialectical compromise between theological pragmatism and philosophical pragmatism. William Dean is correct that Rorty’s commitment to human solidarity implies a metaphysics, for human solidarity is valuable only because natural reality is so harsh. Jeffrey Stout, though, is correct that theistic naturalism is “relevant but redundant,” for God is identical to creative natural experiences. Religious pragmatism is an unjustly neglected alternative in this contemporary revival of classical pragmatism. It is a union of the naturalistic conception of religion from theological pragmatism and the non-theistic metaphysics of philosophical pragmatism . By preserving what is true in each type of pragmatism, religious pragmatism makes constructive dialogue possible
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert Brandom (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Harvard University Press.
M. Gail Hamner (2003). American Pragmatism: A Religious Genealogy. Oxford University Press.
Nancy Frankenberry (1999). Review: Pragmatism, Neo-Pragmatism, and Religion. [REVIEW] Process Studies 28 (3/4).
David O. Kasdan (2011). Neo-Pragmatism, Communication, and the Culture of Creative Democracy (Review). Education and Culture 27 (1):69-72.
Dwayne A. Tunstall (2009). Transcendental Pragmatisms. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):149-159.
Tadeusz Szubka (2012). On the Very Idea of Brandom's Pragmatism. Philosophia 40 (1):165-174.
Michael R. Slater (2008). Pragmatism, Realism, and Religion. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):653-681.
Joseph W. Long (2002). Who's a Pragmatist: Distinguishing Epistemic Pragmatism and Contextualism. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (1):39-49.
Larry A. Hickman (2007). Pragmatism as Post-Postmodernism: Lessons From John Dewey. Fordham University Press.
Roberto Frega, Donatelli Piergiorgio & Laugier Sandra (2010). Pragmatism, Trascendentalism, and Perfectionism. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 2 (2):iv-xiii.
Alan R. Malachowski (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism. Cambridge University Press.
Charles A. Hobbs (2011). Why Classical American Pragmatism is Helpful for Thinking About Death. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (2):182-195.
Colin Koopman (2007). Language is a Form of Experience: Reconciling Classical Pragmatism and Neopragmatism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):694 - 727.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads4 ( #267,530 of 1,101,833 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,762 of 1,101,833 )
How can I increase my downloads?