Functional brain mapping – what is it good for? Absolutely nothing? (Comments on the new phrenology, by William R. uttal)
Brain and Mind 3 (3):367-373 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesWilliam R. Uttal (2002). Response to Bechtel and Lloyd. Brain and Mind 3 (1):261-273.
William R. Uttal (2003). Psychomythics: Sources of Artifacts and Misconceptions in Scientific Psychology. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Dan Lloyd (2002). Studying the Mind From the Inside Out. Brain and Mind 3 (1):243-59.
William P. Bechtel (2002). Decomposing the Brain: A Long Term Pursuit. Brain and Mind 3 (1):229-242.
William R. Uttal (2002). Précis of the New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. Brain and Mind 3 (2):221-228.
Anthony Landreth & Robert C. Richardson (2004). Localization and the New Phrenology: A Review Essay on William Uttal's the New Phrenology. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):107-123.
M. J. Avison (2002). Functional Brain Mapping: What is It Good For? Absolutely Nothing. Brain and Mind 3 (3):367-73.
William R. Uttal (2002). Functional Brain Mapping: What is It Good For? Plenty, but Not Everything. Brain and Mind 3 (3):375-79.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #61,589 of 549,316 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,316 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
