Functional brain mapping – what is it good for? Absolutely nothing? (Comments on the new phrenology, by William R. uttal)
Brain and Mind 3 (3):367-373 (2002)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William R. Uttal (2002). Response to Bechtel and Lloyd. Brain and Mind 3 (1):261-273.
William R. Uttal (2003). Psychomythics: Sources of Artifacts and Misconceptions in Scientific Psychology. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Dan Lloyd (2002). Studying the Mind From the Inside Out. Brain and Mind 3 (1):243-59.
William P. Bechtel (2002). Decomposing the Brain: A Long Term Pursuit. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 3 (1):229-242.
William R. Uttal (2001). The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. MIT Press.
William R. Uttal (2002). Précis of the New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. [REVIEW] Brain and Mind 3 (2):221-228.
Anthony Landreth & Robert C. Richardson (2004). Localization and the New Phrenology: A Review Essay on William Uttal's the New Phrenology. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):107-123.
M. J. Avison (2002). Functional Brain Mapping: What is It Good For? Absolutely Nothing. Brain and Mind 3 (3):367-73.
William R. Uttal (2002). Functional Brain Mapping: What is It Good For? Plenty, but Not Everything. Brain and Mind 3 (3):375-79.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,302 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?