Graduate studies at Western
Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):257-284 (2003)
|Abstract||is a fragment of first-order aritlimetic so weak that it cannot prove the totality of an iterated exponential fimction. Surprisingly, however, the theory is remarkably robust. I will discuss formal results that show that many theorems of number theory and combinatorics are derivable in elementary arithmetic, and try to place these results in a broader philosophical context|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Similar books and articles
Clement F. Kent & Bernard R. Hodgson (1989). Extensions of Arithmetic for Proving Termination of Computations. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):779-794.
Jeremy Avigad & Jeffrey Helzner (2002). Transfer Principles in Nonstandard Intuitionistic Arithmetic. Archive for Mathematical Logic 41 (6):581-602.
Richard Kaye (1991). Model-Theoretic Properties Characterizing Peano Arithmetic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):949-963.
Zlatan Damnjanovic (1997). Elementary Realizability. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (3):311-339.
B. R. Buckingham (1953). Elementary Arithmetic. Boston, Ginn.
António M. Fernandes & Fernando Ferreira (2002). Groundwork for Weak Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):557-578.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #57,917 of 739,375 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,375 )
How can I increase my downloads?