A Formula-Preferential Base for Paraconsistent and Plausible Reasoning Systems
|Abstract||in models. We show that these natural preferential In the research on paraconsistency, preferential systems systems that were originally designed for paraconwere used for constructing logics which are paraconsistent sistent reasoning fulﬁll a key condition (stopperedbut stronger than substructural paraconsistent logics. The ness or smoothness) from the theoretical research preferences in these systems were deﬁned in different ways. of nonmonotonic reasoning. Consequently, the Some were based on checking which abnormal formulas nonmonotonic consequence relations that they in-|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Dominic Hyde & Mark Colyvan (2008). Paraconsistent Vagueness: Why Not? Australasian Journal of Logic 6:107-121.
Arthur Buchsbaum & Tarcisio Pequeno (1993). A Reasoning Method for a Paraconsistent Logic. Studia Logica 52 (2):281 - 289.
Charles G. Morgan (2000). The Nature of Nonmonotonic Reasoning. Minds and Machines 10 (3):321-360.
Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron (2009). A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox. Principia 13 (3):299-326.
Juliana Bueno-Soler (2010). Two Semantical Approaches to Paraconsistent Modalities. Logica Universalis 4 (1):137-160.
Karl Schlechta (2000). New Techniques and Completeness Results for Preferential Structures. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):719-746.
Bryson Brown (1999). Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #290,877 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?